The optimization of the performance of air conditioning systems is mandatory in order to minimize costs by ensuring the attainment of specific thermo-hygrometric conditions of controlled environments at the same time. The aim of the present work is the analysis of the process parameters that play a fundamental role in the conditioning process of controlled microclimates. Starting from a predictive mathematical model that was developed to study the performance of air-conditioned environments, two upgrades are presented by implementing two separate control systems. The first one is based on an adjustable airflow rate and the other on an adjustable inlet temperature of the controlled environment. The first model estimates the energy consumption in terms of heating/cooling and humidification/dehumidification energy and reheat (when such process occurs) with an adjustable airflow rate computed by performing a heat transfer balance of the microclimate environment for a given inlet temperature. In the second model, the energy consumption is evaluated by keeping the airflow rate quasi-constant and adjusting the inlet temperature based on a thermal energy balance of the controlled environment. The results obtained with the two models have been compared under several climatic and set-point (comfort) conditions, thus assessing the advantages and disadvantages of both models.

Optimization of Microclimate Control Systems for Air-conditioned Environments

GENCO, ANGELA;VIGGIANO, ANNARITA;MAGI, Vinicio
2017-01-01

Abstract

The optimization of the performance of air conditioning systems is mandatory in order to minimize costs by ensuring the attainment of specific thermo-hygrometric conditions of controlled environments at the same time. The aim of the present work is the analysis of the process parameters that play a fundamental role in the conditioning process of controlled microclimates. Starting from a predictive mathematical model that was developed to study the performance of air-conditioned environments, two upgrades are presented by implementing two separate control systems. The first one is based on an adjustable airflow rate and the other on an adjustable inlet temperature of the controlled environment. The first model estimates the energy consumption in terms of heating/cooling and humidification/dehumidification energy and reheat (when such process occurs) with an adjustable airflow rate computed by performing a heat transfer balance of the microclimate environment for a given inlet temperature. In the second model, the energy consumption is evaluated by keeping the airflow rate quasi-constant and adjusting the inlet temperature based on a thermal energy balance of the controlled environment. The results obtained with the two models have been compared under several climatic and set-point (comfort) conditions, thus assessing the advantages and disadvantages of both models.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11563/126094
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact