Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has become one of the most sensitive methods to monitor gene expression. An important and often neglected requirement of this kind of study is the validation of appropriate reference genes with the most possible stable expression levels across samples groups. In this paper, several candidates were tested in all the four nymphal instars and the adult morphs (winged and apterous) of aphid Megoura viciae Buckton (Hemiptera Aphididae), an important pest of broad bean, in order to obtain reference genes for future works on Megoura viciae gene expression. Since the use of multiple reference genes is recommended for an accurate normalization, eight candidate genes were tested, encoding respectively for: ribosomal protein L32 (RPL32), NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 1 (NADH), succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit A (SUCC), ribosomal protein S9 (RPS9), TATA-box binding protein (TATA), actin (ACT), β-tubulin (TBU) and ubiquitin-conjugating protein (UBIQ). Three software programs and the comparative ΔCT method were used to compare and rank the candidate genes and RefFinder - a web-based comprehensive tool that integrates all the four methods in a single index - indicated RPS9-RPL32 as the best couple. In addition, our study showed that a common-used reference gene, β-actin, achieved the worst score among our candidates. Finally, differences between the “classic” normalization with β-actin as a reference gene and the normalization using the best reference genes according to our work were highlighted using for the first time a Megoura viciae odorant binding protein, OBP4, as the target gene.

Validation of reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis in Megoura viciae (Hemiptera Aphididae)

GROSSI, GERARDA;FANTI, Paolo;BUFO, Sabino Aurelio;FALABELLA, Patrizia
2016-01-01

Abstract

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has become one of the most sensitive methods to monitor gene expression. An important and often neglected requirement of this kind of study is the validation of appropriate reference genes with the most possible stable expression levels across samples groups. In this paper, several candidates were tested in all the four nymphal instars and the adult morphs (winged and apterous) of aphid Megoura viciae Buckton (Hemiptera Aphididae), an important pest of broad bean, in order to obtain reference genes for future works on Megoura viciae gene expression. Since the use of multiple reference genes is recommended for an accurate normalization, eight candidate genes were tested, encoding respectively for: ribosomal protein L32 (RPL32), NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 1 (NADH), succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit A (SUCC), ribosomal protein S9 (RPS9), TATA-box binding protein (TATA), actin (ACT), β-tubulin (TBU) and ubiquitin-conjugating protein (UBIQ). Three software programs and the comparative ΔCT method were used to compare and rank the candidate genes and RefFinder - a web-based comprehensive tool that integrates all the four methods in a single index - indicated RPS9-RPL32 as the best couple. In addition, our study showed that a common-used reference gene, β-actin, achieved the worst score among our candidates. Finally, differences between the “classic” normalization with β-actin as a reference gene and the normalization using the best reference genes according to our work were highlighted using for the first time a Megoura viciae odorant binding protein, OBP4, as the target gene.
2016
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cristiano et al., 2016.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 2.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.3 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11563/121502
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact