We present and compare results obtained from the analy­sis of poly­chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) of a limited number of contaminated soil samples collected in three areas of Basilicata region (south of Italy). The levels of PCBs were evaluated by using two analytical methods: (i) parallel dual-column gas-chromatography with dual electron capture detectors (GC–ECD) and (ii) gas-chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC–HRMS) via electron impact ionization (EI) in the multiple ion monitoring mode (MIM, two ions per compound). Two extraction methods prior to sample cleanup were also examined: microwave- assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasonic- assisted extraction (UAE). The MAE was the extraction procedure adopted using acetone/ n-hexane (1:1, v/v) as it is mainly characterized by higher sample throughput and allowed reduced consumption of organic solvents. While extraction and analy­sis of spiked soil samples showed the applicability of both methods, systematic differences between the results were obtained for the sum of PCBs as a result of some non-detected congeners by GC–ECD compared with GC–HRMS. Indeed, high resolution MS using EI mode (electron energy 40 eV) with a resolving power of 10,000 provides additional information about the contamination pattern. The GC–ECD screening of 11 soil samples led to just one sample non-compliant to as it was close to the guide value for soils fixed by the Italian legislation (i.e., 60 ppb for private or urban soil). Using GC–HRMS, the amount of all PCBs found ranged from 5.4 to 127 ppb with five soil samples non-compliant to the guide value. The number of identified congeners ranged from 1 to 9 and 9 to 18 using dual-column GC–ECD and GC–HRMS, respectively.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Contaminated Soil Samples Evaluated by GC-ECD and GC-HRMS

GIULIANA BIANCO;
2008-01-01

Abstract

We present and compare results obtained from the analy­sis of poly­chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) of a limited number of contaminated soil samples collected in three areas of Basilicata region (south of Italy). The levels of PCBs were evaluated by using two analytical methods: (i) parallel dual-column gas-chromatography with dual electron capture detectors (GC–ECD) and (ii) gas-chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC–HRMS) via electron impact ionization (EI) in the multiple ion monitoring mode (MIM, two ions per compound). Two extraction methods prior to sample cleanup were also examined: microwave- assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasonic- assisted extraction (UAE). The MAE was the extraction procedure adopted using acetone/ n-hexane (1:1, v/v) as it is mainly characterized by higher sample throughput and allowed reduced consumption of organic solvents. While extraction and analy­sis of spiked soil samples showed the applicability of both methods, systematic differences between the results were obtained for the sum of PCBs as a result of some non-detected congeners by GC–ECD compared with GC–HRMS. Indeed, high resolution MS using EI mode (electron energy 40 eV) with a resolving power of 10,000 provides additional information about the contamination pattern. The GC–ECD screening of 11 soil samples led to just one sample non-compliant to as it was close to the guide value for soils fixed by the Italian legislation (i.e., 60 ppb for private or urban soil). Using GC–HRMS, the amount of all PCBs found ranged from 5.4 to 127 ppb with five soil samples non-compliant to the guide value. The number of identified congeners ranged from 1 to 9 and 9 to 18 using dual-column GC–ECD and GC–HRMS, respectively.
2008
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CHEM 2008 73 104_112.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 772.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
772.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11563/4965
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact